A relevant site is more than a metric on a listing.
We match sites to your industry and audience, prioritising established publications with real readership and relevant editorial focus. The starting question is where your buyers actually read.
We propose sites before placement and you can veto any that do not fit. This is a qualitative matching process, not a published promise of a particular Domain Rating, DA score or traffic threshold.
Start with the reader and the brief
Tell us your positioning, intended readers, competitors, supportable claims and off-limits topics. Those details help distinguish a useful publication from one that shares a broad category label but not the right audience.
A business workflow, an AI tool category and a finance product can need different editorial contexts. We match the subject and audience rather than assume every technology or business site is interchangeable.
Industry context
See the audiences and publication categories relevant to the industries we serve.
Look for relevant editorial focus and real readership
The published selection criteria are qualitative: established publications, relevant editorial focus and real readers in the client’s space. We do not publish numeric DR, DA or traffic minimums, and we do not invent them on this page.
Example publication categories are not partner lists. An illustrative source or headline elsewhere on the site does not establish a relationship with a named publisher.
Propose, then respect the client veto
We propose sites before content is placed. You can veto any that do not fit your brand or audience. This is not a self-serve catalogue where you browse and purchase individual listings.
Writing and placement remain part of the one-time package. If pre-publication approval is required, submit already-approved content with the order; team-written drafts are not sent for approval.
Keep regulatory responsibilities clear
Your team remains responsible for regulatory obligations in your jurisdictions. Submit legally or internally approved content if that review is required before publication.
We use supportable brand information, manage publisher editorial review and keep sponsorship labeling visible. In finance and web3 we avoid investment advice, return or yield promises and token-price talk. Site matching is not a promise of legal or regulatory compliance.
Sponsorship and the Google paid-link disclosure
Sponsored placements are paid and labeled. They are not earned media or independent editorial endorsements. #1 position within arranged sponsored listicle features is purchased, not an independent editorial judgment.
All links are do-follow. No nofollow or sponsored-rel option is offered. Google treats paid links that pass ranking credit as link spam and recommends rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow" for paid links. Our paid do-follow links can therefore conflict with Google’s guidelines. We do not claim blanket compliance or guarantee rankings. Discuss the risk with your SEO lead before buying.
Google Search Central: link spam
Official policy on paid links passing ranking credit.
Questions, answered plainly
Do you promise a minimum DR, DA or monthly traffic figure?
No numeric thresholds are published for our service. Selection is based on industry and audience fit, established publications, real readership and relevant editorial focus.
Can I veto a proposed publication?
Yes. We propose sites before placement and you can veto any that do not fit your brand or audience.
Who handles legal review?
Your team remains responsible for regulatory obligations. Submit already-approved content if approval is required; team-written drafts are not sent for pre-publication approval.
Ready when you are. No retainer.
One-time packages. Writing and placement included. No subscription.
Last updated